Best Geopolitical Predictions for 2026: Jiang's Tested Calls by Region
The best geopolitical predictions for 2026 are not vague horoscope readings — they are specific, dated claims from a forecaster whose earlier calls have been checked, in public, against what actually happened. This tracker has extracted 372 predictions from Professor Jiang Xueqin's YouTube lectures (drawn from 175 source lectures, 174 of them transcribed). As of 2026-07-22, 21 have resolved: 16 confirmed and 5 wrong, a headline accuracy of 76%. That is a strong record, with an honest caveat that 21 resolved is still a small sample. The largest cluster to land inside 2026 is his US-Iran war thesis, a set of calls made as far back as April 2024.
The Middle East: a war called two years early
Iran dominates Jiang's 2026 record, and most of it scored as confirmed. His April 2024 call that the United States would go to war with Iran within two to four years (P011) is the anchor; it was confirmed when open-source reporting documented direct US and Israeli strikes on Iran in 2026. Around it sits a web of supporting calls, nearly all of them right: the bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities (P012), the destruction of Iran's navy (P105, March 2026), and a decapitation strike that killed Ayatollah Khamenei around March 1, 2026 (P088).
Several counterintuitive calls also landed. Jiang argued in May 2024 that the Shock and Awe doctrine would fail against Iran (P015) and that nuclear weapons would not be used in the conflict (P016, predicted early 2026) — both confirmed. He predicted Iran would close the Strait of Hormuz (P026) and attack Gulf states including Dubai, Bahrain, and Qatar at the outbreak of war (P027), and that strikes on Iranian civilian infrastructure — water, dams, power plants — would escalate (P020). The one notable miss in this band: a May 2024 claim that Putin would extend a nuclear umbrella over Iran (P017) never materialized.
The structural shape of the conflict tracked his map too. A March 2026 prediction that the war would run weeks to years (P018) confirmed. His succession thesis — that Mojtaba Khamenei becomes Iran's next Supreme Leader within roughly five years of 2024 (P041) — rounds out the Iran cluster and also scored confirmed.
The Americas: Venezuela and the election model
Jiang's American calls show both his strengths and his method's willingness to be wrong. He predicted in April 2024 that Donald Trump would win the presidency (P001) — confirmed — and that JD Vance was a strong vice-presidential pick (P002b, confirmed), while a competing May 2024 call that Trump would choose Nikki Haley (P002a) was wrong. Making both calls and absorbing the miss is part of what makes the record auditable.
Further south, a December 2025 prediction that the United States would attack Venezuela (P082, on a short-term timeline) scored as confirmed in 2026.
China and technology: restraint and the AI thesis
Outside the war zone, two calls stand out. His early-2026 assessment that Beijing would stay out of the Iran conflict (P071) proved accurate and is a useful corrective to the great-power-escalation framing common among the best geopolitical analysts in 2026. In technology, his May 2026 prediction that AI companies would push AI girlfriends and sexual companions to drive engagement (P129, on a 2026-2027 timeline) was confirmed — a call less about statecraft than about where attention and capital were heading.
The open board: 333 calls still on the clock
The confirmed record above is only 21 of 372. If you want to know what to expect in 2026 geopolitics, the 333 still-pending calls are a better guide than any single confirmed hit. They are a mix of `not_yet` and set-aside predictions whose deadlines have not yet arrived, and rather than freeze a list that will go stale, the honest move is to send you to the live board: browse every prediction still awaiting resolution, or walk the full chronological timeline of every call and its outcome.
Two caveats on reading this. First, the 76% figure counts only terminal verdicts — confirmed and wrong — against each other; everything pending is excluded, so it will move as calls resolve. Second, confirmed and wrong are terminal here and never revert, which keeps the public score from being quietly rewritten. The denominator is small. Treat the record as promising and still under test, not as settled.
Browse all tracked predictions · Accuracy analysis · All blog posts