Jiang Xueqin's Wrong Predictions: 4 Misses Out of 29 Resolved
Professor Jiang Xueqin's YouTube channel, Predictive History, has made hundreds of specific geopolitical forecasts since early 2024. As of June 2026, this tracker has catalogued 335 predictions across 157 transcribed lectures. Of the 29 that have been resolved against real-world events, 25 were correct (confirmed or partially confirmed) and 4 were wrong — a headline accuracy rate of 86%.
That denominator is small. Most predictions — 306 of 335 — are still pending, many with timelines stretching into 2027 and beyond. The 86% figure will shift as more resolve. What won't shift is the commitment to document every miss alongside every hit.
The Four Wrong Predictions
- P002a — Trump will pick Nikki Haley as Vice President. Predicted in May 2024 (Geo-Strategy #5) with moderate confidence. Trump instead selected JD Vance, a prediction Jiang himself also made separately (P002b, confirmed). Jiang effectively hedged — listing both possibilities — but the Haley call was wrong.
- P017 — Putin will declare a nuclear umbrella over Iran. Predicted in May 2024 (Geo-Strategy #8) with high confidence, expecting the declaration before or at the start of a US-Iran conflict. When strikes on Iran escalated in early 2026, Russia offered diplomatic support but no formal nuclear guarantee. Iran's nuclear facilities were bombed (P012, confirmed) without any Russian nuclear deterrent materializing.
- P040 — Muhammad Mokhber will win Iran's June 2024 presidential election. Predicted in May 2024 (Geo-Strategy #7) with moderate confidence. Mokhber, the acting president after Raisi's death, lost the snap election to reformist candidate Masoud Pezeshkian. Jiang's broader call about Iranian regime continuity (P041, confirmed — Mojtaba Khamenei as next Supreme Leader) proved more durable than his specific electoral pick.
- P064 — Marine Le Pen's party could govern France within 3 months. Predicted in June 2024 (Geo-Strategy END) with moderate confidence, targeting September 2024. After the July snap election, a left-wing coalition and centrist bloc instead blocked the National Rally from forming a government.
What the Misses Reveal
Three patterns stand out. First, Jiang is more accurate on structural and long-range geopolitical shifts — war trajectories, regime dynamics, great-power posturing — than on short-term electoral outcomes. Three of the four misses (P002a, P040, P064) involved specific political races or personnel decisions within months of the call. His confirmed predictions skew toward strategic and military events playing out over longer windows.
Second, Jiang sometimes hedges by making overlapping predictions that cover contradictory outcomes. The Haley VP pick (P002a, wrong) and the Vance VP pick (P002b, confirmed) are the clearest example. This is standard practice in probabilistic forecasting — you spread risk across scenarios — but it means the raw accuracy number requires context.
Third, the one miss on a structural call — Putin's nuclear umbrella (P017) — reflects a genuine analytical error. Jiang rated this "high confidence" and it was central to his argument that US escalation against Iran would be constrained. The constraint didn't materialize, yet the broader prediction about the war's trajectory (P018, confirmed — a prolonged conflict) still held.
The Bigger Statistical Picture
Four wrong out of 29 resolved is a meaningful data point, but not a final verdict. The full list of wrong predictions is always visible on this tracker, alongside 14 confirmed and 11 partially confirmed calls. With 306 predictions still waiting on real-world outcomes, the accuracy rate could move substantially in either direction.
Jiang's predictive history misses are notable precisely because they are rare among resolved calls — and because documenting them openly is the entire point of this project. A tracker that buries its misses isn't a tracker worth trusting.
Browse all tracked predictions · Accuracy analysis · All blog posts