Q&A Updated

The Forecaster Who Predicted World War 3 — Scored in Public

Professor Jiang Xueqin did — openly, on the record, and more than a year before the first missiles flew. In his Substack essay World War III Begins, Jiang laid out the thesis that the United States was on a path to war with Iran, and that this conflict would be the opening front of a wider global realignment rather than a contained regional clash. It is the most explicit set of world war 3 predictions from a single public forecaster that this site tracks — and unusually, it is being graded in public, call by call, against live news.

As of 2026-07-21, jiangpredictions.com has catalogued 372 distinct predictions from 175 source lectures (174 transcribed). Of the 21 that have fully resolved, 16 were confirmed and 5 were wrong — a headline accuracy of 76%. That denominator is still small, and we say so plainly. But on the specific question of an Iran-centered war, Jiang's calls have held up strikingly well. The full record, including the misses, lives on the predictions tracker.

The thesis: a war that was supposed to stay regional

World War III Begins is not a single point prediction; it is an analytical framework. Jiang's argument, distilled across lectures beginning in April 2024, is that the security architecture holding the post-1945 order together is coming apart region by region. The Iran war is, in his telling, the first domino.

Within that frame sits a cluster of US-Iran war predictions that have already been settled:

One call in this cluster missed: Jiang predicted in May 2024 (P017) that Vladimir Putin would declare a nuclear umbrella over Iran, deterring American nuclear use. That did not happen. Notably, though, the underlying outcome he was forecasting — no nuclear use — was correct on the merits (P016); the mechanism he named was wrong. That kind of split is exactly why honest scoring separates the two.

The unfinished fronts

What separates a ww3 prediction from a regional-war prediction is scope. Jiang has argued that the Iran conflict is one theater in a simultaneous fracturing of the global order — and those calls remain open, sitting in the 333 predictions still classified as not_yet or unverifiable:

None of these can be graded yet. They are where Jiang's World War III thesis either broadens into a real global pattern or stays a vivid but incomplete analogy. The decade-scale calls are the hardest to judge, and they make up the bulk of what is still pending.

How much should that track record move you?

Honestly: some, with caveats. A 76% hit rate over 21 resolved predictions is a strong start, not a verdict. The sample skews toward short-horizon, verifiable military calls, which are easier to grade than decade-scale structural ones — and the unresolved bulk of Jiang's work is precisely that harder, longer-arc material. Anyone weighing world war 3 predictions should measure the confirmed cluster against the open one, and against the one clear miss.

What makes Jiang's case unusual is not certainty but transparency. Every prediction is timestamped, sourced to a specific lecture, and re-checked daily against news. You can read the full record on the predictions tracker, and the forecaster behind it in our profile of Jiang Xueqin. His World War III thesis may yet narrow to a regional war that stayed regional. But on the evidence so far, the man who said it had started was more right than wrong.

Browse all tracked predictions · Accuracy analysis · All blog posts

Track his next call

He predicted the Iran war, Trump's comeback, and the fall of Khamenei — on camera, before they happened. Get a free email the moment his next prediction is confirmed or proven wrong.